Casinos That Accept AstroPay in the UK

A live cashier check helps confirm whether AstroPay is available for an account and what payment rules apply to deposits and withdrawals.

Updated November 2026

Licensed

Available in GB

Fast payouts

18+ Only

AstroPay Availability at UK Casinos in 2026

I would not treat a casino as an AstroPay option merely because a search result, comparison page or old review says so. Payment menus change, and a page can remain visible after the cashier has been updated. For casinos that accept AstroPay in the UK in 2026, the useful test is narrower: does the current cashier display AstroPay for the account being used, at the point a deposit is being set up?

That distinction matters because a payment method can be listed somewhere on a site without being available to every customer. A general payments page may describe methods supported by the operator, while the cashier presents only those enabled for a particular account. A method may also be visible in an older review but absent from the live deposit flow. I have found that the cashier is the operational record; surrounding descriptions are supporting information, not proof of current access.

Check the live cashier, not the label

A reliable check starts after signing in to the casino account and opening its cashier. The payment options displayed there are more relevant than a logo in a footer or a broad statement that the site supports digital wallets. If AstroPay is not offered in the deposit menu, there is no sound basis for assuming that a general payment-method mention means it can be used from that account.

Even a visible option needs a closer look before it is treated as a working route. The cashier may ask for account details, show the payment provider’s flow, or indicate that a particular product is not eligible. Those steps establish more than a bare mention on a promotional page. The important point is not whether AstroPay exists as a payment service, but whether the casino’s current setup accepts the specific AstroPay product and account involved.

A specialist review can be useful as a lead, but it is not a live confirmation. Reviews may reflect a particular time, country setting or account journey. Casino payment menus can also differ by customer, so one person’s screenshot does not settle what another account will show. I would use third-party descriptions to identify what might be worth checking, then rely on the cashier for the actual decision.

Casino Payments: UK Banking and Crypto Options

Method listed does not mean every product qualifies

“Supports AstroPay” sounds simple; in practice, it can hide several separate checks. The casino may make a payment brand available while accepting only certain account types or card products within that brand. The customer’s own eligibility can matter too. A method name on a page does not establish that every card, wallet balance or account linked to the service will pass the provider’s and casino’s checks.

The same caution applies to information about other payment methods. A specialist review may list Visa and Mastercard, but that does not confirm current UK availability or that every card product is eligible. The cashier is where those details need to be checked. Naming a payment network is not the same as confirming that a particular card works for a particular customer.

That is why I would avoid treating a broad list as a promise. It is an inventory claim, not an account-level result. The distinction is easy to miss when a page groups payment logos together, but the cashier can filter methods according to the account and the product presented. If the method is absent, or the payment flow rejects the product, the site’s general wording cannot turn it into a usable option.

What a current check can establish

A live cashier check answers a practical question: whether the account currently offers AstroPay as a deposit method. It does not make every other claim about the casino true, and it does not establish that a payment method mentioned elsewhere will work. Availability should be judged against the screen actually presented to the account, not inferred from a casino’s age, a “new” label, a mobile version or a list copied across comparison pages.

This also prevents a common category error: confusing the payment service with the casino’s implementation of it. AstroPay may be recognised as a brand, while a particular operator has not enabled it, has changed its cashier, or makes it available only under conditions shown during the transaction. The difference is operational, not semantic. A name in a list does not move money.

Do

• Check the live cashier after signing in to confirm AstroPay availability.
• Verify if your specific account or card product is eligible for the chosen method.
• Review the withdrawal terms to see if the deposit method can also receive funds.

Don’t

• Rely on promotional pages, footers, or old reviews as proof of current access.
• Assume that a broad list of supported methods applies to every customer or account.
• Treat a deposit-only method as a guaranteed route for both funding and withdrawals.

I would therefore read claims about all AstroPay casinos in the UK as a request for a current, account-specific check rather than as a settled directory. The same applies to claims about the best sites, new casinos or Android access: those labels do not verify that AstroPay appears in the live cashier. On a mobile device as on a desktop, the decisive detail remains the payment menu presented to that account. No shortcut.

Top online casinos in the UK

1. Amunbet
   Bonus: Join now and get 450% up to 2,700 GBP + 450 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
2. Revery Play
   Bonus: 100% up to€1,000+ 100 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
3. SpinFormula
   Bonus: 550% Up To £15,000 + 550 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
4. BeOnBet
   Bonus: 100% up to €500 + 100 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
5. SlotoSport
   Bonus: 500% up to £ 10 200+ 777 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
6. EvoSpin
   Bonus: 125% up to €2500 + 125 Free Spins · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
7. Zombillion
   Bonus: Welcome Pack 250% up to £4000 + 200 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days

What Can Replace AstroPay at the Deposit Stage

When AstroPay is not available in a casino cashier, the useful comparison is between payment types the site actually presents. UK casino deposit options commonly include debit cards, with e-wallets, prepaid vouchers and bank-based routes appearing at some sites. That does not make every method available to every customer: the cashier’s list is the practical test, and the account’s eligibility still matters.

I would start with the deposit screen rather than a general payment-method page. A site can describe a method without offering it for a particular account, and a payment brand’s presence does not establish that every card or product under that brand will work. The deposit flow is where the operator applies its own available routes and checks.

Debit cards: the straightforward comparison

Debit cards are the broadest familiar alternative in the verified options. UK casinos commonly accept debit cards, including Visa and Mastercard, but a logo on a site is not a guarantee that a specific card product is eligible. Current availability should be confirmed in the cashier before entering payment details.

Casinos That Accept Bank Cheques in the UK

The distinction between debit and credit is important in Britain. Credit-card payments for gambling are prohibited at UK-licensed casinos, so a card alternative means an eligible debit card, not a credit card. A card that is linked to a credit facility should not be treated as a valid workaround. The operator must apply the relevant restrictions to the payment route, not merely rely on the label a customer gives it.

In practical terms, a debit card is a direct option when it appears in the deposit menu and the card is accepted by the operator’s checks. It is not a promise of support for every issuer, card type or customer account. A method shown in a general help page may not settle that question. The cashier does.

E-wallets: presence is site-specific

Skrill and Neteller are available at some UK casino sites, rather than being universal alternatives. Their availability has to be checked at the individual operator. A specialist review may describe either wallet as an option, but that is a lead to verify, not a substitute for the live cashier.

An e-wallet can feel like a separate layer between a bank account and a casino account. That does not change the operator’s eligibility rules or turn one wallet into a guaranteed route. The displayed option, the wallet account and the casino account must all fit the operator’s requirements. A name in a payment list is only the beginning.

Debit Cards

Commonly includes Visa and Mastercard, but eligibility must be confirmed in the cashier.

E-wallets

Options like Skrill and Neteller are site-specific and may have different promotional rules.

Prepaid Vouchers

Methods like Paysafecard are typically deposit-only and not a full transaction route.

Bank-based Payments

Includes open banking and transfers, which may offer different customer journeys.

These wallets can also be treated differently from other deposit routes under promotional terms. Some e-wallet deposits may be excluded from promotions, so deposit compatibility and promotion eligibility are separate questions. The bonus rules belong to a different decision; the deposit screen establishes whether the route is available for funding.

Prepaid vouchers: a deposit-only route

Paysafecard is a prepaid voucher that can be used for deposits. Its defining limitation is that it is deposit-only, so it should not be mistaken for a complete payment route for money moving both into and out of a casino account. Its role is narrower than a debit card or bank-based option.

That can still make a voucher a possible substitute at the funding stage, provided the casino offers it in the cashier. The method’s presence does not imply that every voucher purchase or account is accepted. The operator’s displayed instructions determine what can be entered and how the deposit is handled.

Bank-based payments

Open banking and bank transfers are another category to look for. A specialist review has described these routes as capable of providing instant deposits and fast withdrawals at many sites; that wording should not be read as a guarantee for every casino or transaction. For the deposit decision, the point is simply that a bank-based option may be available alongside cards and wallets.

The two labels do not necessarily describe an identical customer journey. One route may connect a bank account through an open-banking service, while another may ask for a transfer through the bank’s own process. The cashier’s instructions show which kind is offered and what information is required. A general claim that a site supports bank payments is not enough to identify the exact deposit route for an account.

Casinos That Accept EntroPay in the UK: Payment Checks

How to compare the options

For a deposit-only comparison, I would reduce the choice to three checks: whether the method appears in the casino cashier, whether the account or card product is eligible, and whether the route’s limits and terms suit the intended deposit. The first two establish compatibility; the third avoids confusing a listed method with an unrestricted one.

That is also the sensible way to assess an AstroPay substitute. A casino accepting a debit card, an e-wallet, a voucher or a bank-based payment does not establish that it accepts AstroPay, nor does it identify a universal replacement. The alternative is the route that is explicitly available for that account and transaction.

No method wins by category alone. Cards, wallets, vouchers and bank-based payments each work differently, and their presence varies between operators. I would treat the cashier as the final word on deposit compatibility, rather than infer support from a brand name elsewhere on the site.

Deposits, Withdrawals and the Original-Payment-Source Rule

A deposit route does not automatically define a separate withdrawal route. In a UK casino account, the cashier records where funds came from, and that record matters when a payout is requested. Anti-money-laundering rules commonly require winnings and returned funds to go back to the original payment source. This is a control against fraud and misuse, not a promise that every method shown for deposits can also receive withdrawals.

Original Payment Rule

Anti-money-laundering rules often require winnings to be returned to the original payment source used for deposits.

That distinction matters when considering AstroPay. A casino may display a payment method for deposits, but that alone does not establish that withdrawals can be sent to it. The account’s cashier terms and payout instructions determine what the operator supports. I have seen payment labels treated as if they described the full transaction in both directions. They do not. Deposit access is only one part of the route.

The practical sequence is straightforward: the customer funds the account, the casino records the source, and a withdrawal is assessed against that record. If the original route can receive the payout, the operator may return funds there. If it cannot, or if the account’s payment details do not match, the casino may require another route and ask for further evidence before releasing the funds.

That is where closed-loop rules become visible. Operators need to establish that money is going back to the person and source associated with the account, rather than being redirected to an unrelated destination. An alternative payout route can therefore mean extra verification. The request is not necessarily a sign that a payment has failed; it can be part of checking ownership and keeping the transaction within anti-fraud and AML controls.

Account ownership is central. A payment account belonging to someone else can create a mismatch even when the deposit itself went through. The name and account details held by the casino need to make sense alongside the payment source. In my experience, treating the deposit method as a disposable step is where avoidable friction starts. The cleanest route is one account, used consistently.

Casinos That Accept Giropay in the UK: What Works

A cashier entry can also be conditional rather than universal. It may appear for a particular customer, payment product or account configuration, while the withdrawal screen offers a different set of routes. The deposit confirmation is not proof of payout eligibility. The operator’s instructions for the account are the relevant point of reference.

Withdrawal processing also includes the casino’s own approval. A payment can be waiting for review before it is sent onward, and an initial withdrawal may take longer while identity and payment details are checked. A specialist casino review has reported this possibility, but it should not be read as a fixed timing rule for every operator or account. The stages differ: casino approval comes first, then the payment provider or bank handles the transfer.

A delay can therefore have more than one cause. The operator may be confirming identity, checking that the source belongs to the account holder, or establishing how an alternative route should be used. Once approved, the payout still depends on the receiving method’s process. “Fast withdrawal” describes neither every stage nor every account.

For AstroPay specifically, the safe reading is narrow: acceptance for deposits does not settle whether a casino can return funds through the same service. The cashier and withdrawal terms need to be considered together, with any alternative route and verification requirement made clear before relying on it. Payment labels are not a payout policy.

Withdrawal Limits

A deposit method being available does not guarantee it can be used for payouts; check the cashier’s withdrawal instructions specifically.

Using a Mobile Casino Cashier for Slot Deposits

On a phone, the cashier is the practical test of whether a payment route is available. A casino page may mention a method, but that does not establish that it appears for every account, device or product. For AstroPay mobile slots in the UK, the useful distinction is between a method discussed on a site and one the logged-in cashier actually offers for a deposit.

I have seen payment lists treated as promises when they are really snapshots of an operator’s setup. Methods can differ by account eligibility, and payment information may not be updated at the same time as the cashier. The live options shown after signing in are the relevant ones. If AstroPay is absent there, a general page listing it is not enough to confirm that it can fund that account.

The same check applies when using a mobile browser or casino app: open the cashier, select deposit, and look for AstroPay among the available routes before starting a transaction. A page that loads well on a phone does not, by itself, show that the payment method is enabled. Nor does a search result for online slots that accept AstroPay establish current compatibility at a particular UK casino.

Check the account, not the wording.

There is a second distinction that is easy to miss: a method being available for deposits does not mean it is supported for withdrawals. The cashier may present a route only for adding funds, while payout arrangements are handled separately. Deposit access is not withdrawal access.

Casinos That Accept Maestro in the UK: What to Check

That matters when judging whether a mobile casino payment setup is complete. The visible deposit option answers only whether the account can use that route to fund play. It does not settle where a later payout can be sent, or whether the operator will require another route. Those conditions should be read in the cashier or the operator’s payment terms, rather than inferred from a deposit button.

For card payments, a specialist review may list Visa and Mastercard, but that listing cannot confirm current UK availability or whether a particular card product is eligible. The cashier is where those details need to be checked for the account in use. UK-licensed casinos cannot accept credit-card payments for gambling, so a card listing should not be read as permission to use a credit card.

The phrase “mobile-friendly payments” can sound broader than it is. In practice, the phone is only the interface; the account’s available methods and their permitted use determine whether a transaction can proceed. A payment screen that accepts a deposit is not a promise about every later stage.

For real-money slot deposits, the reliable sequence is simple: confirm the method in the account cashier, check that it is offered for deposits, and do not assume that this also establishes withdrawal support. If AstroPay appears, that confirms a deposit option for that account at that time. Nothing more.

Real-Money Slot Play and Payout Timing

A deposit showing in a casino balance is not the same as a withdrawal arriving in a bank account. I have seen the two stages treated as if they were one service, especially in payment copy that calls a route “instant”. That word may describe the incoming deposit; it says little about how quickly winnings can be released.

Timing Differences

Quick deposits do not guarantee fast withdrawals, as payout processes involve separate casino and provider reviews.

With real-money slot play, the cashier processes a deposit before the balance can be used. A payout follows a separate route: the casino reviews the withdrawal, checks the account and then sends the funds through the relevant payment channel. Each stage has its own handling time. A quick deposit is no promise about the payout.

What happens before a payout is sent

The casino’s internal approval process affects withdrawal timing. The account’s verification status matters too. If checks are incomplete, the operator may need to finish them before releasing funds. That can make an initial withdrawal take longer than a later one, once the account has been verified.

This is not a slot-game feature. It is an account and payment process. A spin can settle in the game balance while a withdrawal request remains under review. The balance and the cash-out status are different things.

A specialist review describes this distinction in practical terms: card deposits can be immediate, while payouts may take several business days. That is an illustration of how the stages can differ, not a timetable that applies to every casino or payment route. The operator’s cashier and withdrawal terms set the relevant expectations for that account.

The useful distinction is simple. “Fast deposit” refers to money entering the account; “fast withdrawal” depends on approval, verification and the payment process after approval. They should not be read as interchangeable claims.

Reading timing claims realistically

For anyone considering AstroPay for real-money slot deposits, the same distinction applies if the method is available in the casino cashier. Its presence at deposit stage would not establish that withdrawals are supported through it, nor would it determine how quickly a payout is approved. The cashier’s displayed options and the casino’s withdrawal rules govern those details.

Casinos That Accept Klarna in the UK: Payment Guide

I would treat a balance update as confirmation that the deposit has reached the gambling account, not as evidence about the eventual cash-out. A withdrawal request can still be pending even when play has finished and the balance is settled. First-time verification is a common point where the sequence slows down.

The practical check is to read the withdrawal conditions before relying on a deposit-speed claim. Look for the operator’s stated approval process and any account checks that must be completed. If the account is not fully verified, the payout may wait while those checks are resolved. No shortcut in the deposit stage removes that step.

“Instant” is a narrow claim. The review still comes first.

Card Deposits, Fast Payouts and the Credit-Card Boundary

When a UK casino cashier lists card deposits, the relevant products are eligible debit cards, including Visa and Mastercard. The word “card” can blur an important distinction: a familiar card brand may issue both debit and credit products, but that does not make both usable for gambling. The cashier’s listing and the card’s eligibility need to match.

Credit-card payments for gambling have been prohibited in the UK since 14 April 2020, and the rule has not been relaxed. Remote gambling licensees must not accept them, including where credit-card funds are routed through a money service business. Nor can a casino sidestep the restriction by taking a wallet payment if that wallet permits credit-card funds to be used for gambling. The funding source matters, not just the button selected at checkout.

Credit Card Prohibition

Attention UK-licensed casinos are prohibited from accepting credit card payments for gambling.

That boundary also matters when people look for AstroPay casinos that accept credit cards or debit cards. A search phrase does not establish that AstroPay is available at a particular casino, or that a specific card can fund an AstroPay account. Each service and card product has its own eligibility, so card funding should not be assumed from a brand name alone.

The timing distinction is separate. A specialist review describes a card deposit as potentially appearing instantly, while a payout may take several business days. That difference is not a contradiction: money arriving at the casino and money leaving it are different stages. A deposit can be authorised by the card provider and credited without the casino having completed its withdrawal checks.

From behind the cashier, “instant” describes a narrow part of the transaction. It does not promise that a withdrawal will be sent instantly, reach the same card, or follow the same route as the deposit. A direct payout depends on the casino’s available payout options and its handling of the transaction; the word “card” alone says nothing about withdrawal support. So an AstroPay debit deposit should not be read as evidence of an AstroPay fast withdrawal or direct withdrawal facility.

There is a similar gap between funding and play. A successful card deposit may make funds available for slot play, but it does not turn a credit card into an eligible payment method or guarantee a particular payout route. The useful distinction is plain: debit-card eligibility governs the deposit; casino processing governs the withdrawal. Fast in, slower out.

Casinos That Accept Apple Pay in the UK

Bonuses and Payment-Method Eligibility

A payment method appearing in a casino cashier does not mean it qualifies for every promotion. Deposit access and bonus eligibility are separate settings: an operator can accept a transaction through a route while excluding that route from a welcome offer or another promotion. I have seen this distinction matter most when the promotion’s terms are read only after a deposit has been made.

PayPal illustrates the point. A specialist review describes it as popular for speed and convenience, while noting that it may be excluded from bonus eligibility. That is a reported condition, not a rule that applies to every casino. The cashier confirms whether a deposit route is available; the promotion’s terms determine whether a deposit through it counts.

Some e-wallets can face the same split. Skrill and Neteller are offered at some sites, and a specialist review reports that they are often excluded from promotions. The wording matters: “often” is not “always”. Eligibility depends on the specific offer and operator, so a method’s presence in the cashier cannot settle the question.

AstroPay should be treated on the same basis. Its acceptance, where available, would not by itself establish eligibility for a welcome bonus, a slots promotion or a no-deposit offer. I would not assume that an AstroPay deposit unlocks a bonus, or that a bonus code changes the payment rules. The offer’s own terms are decisive.

Before a promotional deposit, the relevant detail is the payment-method clause, not the headline. It may state that deposits made with particular wallets do not qualify, or set other conditions for the transaction. If the wording is unclear, the operator’s support team can confirm how the offer applies before money is moved. A deposit that has already been made may not become eligible simply because the method was accepted.

This is where “welcome bonus” can sound broader than it is. In practice, the offer is a bundle of conditions, and the payment route can be one of them. I separate two checks: whether the cashier accepts the method for the account, and whether the chosen promotion accepts deposits made that way. Neither answer guarantees the other.

That distinction also applies to searches for AstroPay casinos with bonuses or AstroPay slots offers. A casino may support real-money deposits through a method without attaching any special bonus to it. No AstroPay-specific offer should be assumed unless the operator states it in the current promotion terms. Verify the route and the offer separately.

Minimum Deposits, Limits and Responsible-Gambling Controls

A minimum deposit is set by the casino and can differ according to the payment method. A specialist casino review puts the starting range at £10–£20, but that is not a fixed UK-wide tariff. The cashier’s current terms are the useful reference: a figure attached to one route may not apply to another, and AstroPay eligibility would not establish a particular minimum for an account.

Casinos That Accept Ukash in the UK: Current Options

The same distinction matters when searching for an AstroPay casino with a £5 minimum. A low figure should not be assumed from the payment brand or from a listing elsewhere. The casino may set its own floor, while the cashier determines which methods are available for that account. Check the amount displayed before confirming a deposit. Small detail, real consequence.

Maximum deposit limits can also differ by payment method and account status. A casino may apply a transaction ceiling as well as daily or monthly caps; these are not necessarily identical across routes or accounts. I have seen players treat a payment provider’s own allowance as if it were the casino’s limit. They are separate controls, and the lower one may determine what can be deposited. The cashier and account terms clarify the applicable cap.

Responsible-gambling controls are part of this process, not an optional add-on. UKGC rules require remote gambling licensees to prompt new customers to set a financial limit before making a first deposit. They must also provide accessible account-level controls for managing limits. That means the first deposit sits behind an affordability step: the account holder sets a boundary before funds are added.

A limit is useful only if it reflects what can be spent without affecting essential costs. It should not be treated as a target to reach, or as a workaround for a payment-method cap. Casino deposit limits govern what a transaction may allow; account-level financial limits are there to help control gambling spend. The two can apply at once.

In practice, the cashier shows the deposit floor and payment cap, while account controls show the financial boundary set for gambling. Those figures can change, so an old review or saved note may no longer describe the account. Check them before proceeding.

Deposit Checklist

• Confirm the method appears in the live casino cashier.
• Check that your specific card or account is eligible.
• Verify the minimum and maximum deposit limits for the method.
• Review the promotional terms for any payment exclusions.

Comparing Alternative Payment Routes by Cost and Speed

The practical comparison between payment routes is not just a question of how quickly a deposit appears. A withdrawal has its own path, and the time shown at checkout may exclude the casino’s review. A specialist payment review identifies PayPal, open banking services and debit cards connected to fast payout systems as potentially quick withdrawal routes; that is a reported comparison, not a promise for every casino or account.

Bank transfers have different timing variables. The receiving bank’s cut-off, weekends and currency conversion can affect when funds arrive. A transfer that has been approved by a casino is not necessarily already available in the bank account. The hand-off matters.

Cost is just as layered. A casino may charge a transaction fee, while the payment provider, card issuer or bank may apply its own. If a transaction changes currency, the exchange-rate spread can add a cost that is less visible than a flat fee. Some routes also involve network fees. The amount received, rather than the label “free”, is the useful comparison.

In my experience, the easy mistake is to compare only the casino’s cashier screen. That shows one part of the transaction, not necessarily every charge applied by the institutions handling it. I would compare the casino’s stated fees with the provider’s terms, the bank or issuer’s charges and the exchange rate that would be used for the actual currency.

There is no payment route that is automatically the cheapest or quickest in every case. Speed depends on the casino’s processing and the route used for the payout; cost depends on the combined charges and any conversion. A method that performs well for one account may not do so for another.

The sensible comparison is specific: the same casino, the same currency and the same withdrawal amount. Then the trade-off becomes clear—less waiting, fewer deductions, or neither. No universal winner.

Casinos That Accept CashToCode in the UK

AstroPay, GamStop and Keeping Payment Details Consistent

AstroPay does not determine whether a casino is connected to GamStop. These are separate questions: one concerns a payment service, the other a self-exclusion scheme. A cashier showing AstroPay would not, by itself, establish a casino’s GamStop status, and a site described as outside GamStop is not thereby shown to accept AstroPay.

That distinction matters for searches for AstroPay casinos not on GamStop in the UK. A payment label cannot be used as evidence that a site is suitable for someone who has self-excluded. Nor does the presence of a payment method change the protections or regulatory position that apply to a gambling operator. For customers in Great Britain, remote gambling licensees serving the market must hold the relevant UK Gambling Commission licence. GamStop status and licensing are not interchangeable checks.

I would treat claims about non-GamStop casinos accepting AstroPay cautiously unless the operator’s current cashier confirms the method for the particular account. A general page, old listing or payment logo may not reflect what is available at the point of deposit. The same applies to claims about AstroPay slots: the payment method does not identify a game or establish that a casino is suitable for a particular player.

There is a separate, practical point in keeping payment details consistent. Account information and the payment route should belong to the same customer. When names or ownership details do not match, a transaction can attract avoidable questions even when the payment itself is legitimate. In my experience, the least complicated arrangement is one payment account used consistently for deposits and withdrawals, where the casino supports that route.

Consistency is not a way around self-exclusion, identity checks or an operator’s rules. It is simply a cleaner record of who owns the casino account and who made the payment. Keep the details aligned.

Responsible Gambling